Institution: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Additional authors:Gerald Wertheim, Rebecca King
Session: Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms
HISTORY
This patient is a 12 year old girl who presented in January of 2010 with a history of bone pain. CBC was normal. MRI studies showed bony lesions. Clinical exam was unremarkable. Bone marrow evaluation revealed a diagnosis of primary bone diffuse large B cell lymphoma (details below). She was treated and achieved remission. In April of 2011, she presented to Oncology Clinic and was found to have blasts on her peripheral blood smear. WBC was 6,400 thou/uL with 24% blasts. Bone marrow biopsy and aspirate were performed (details below).
DETAILS
Bone marrow, aspirates and biopsies (decalcified and fixed in AZF).
January 2010: The right side showed a hypercellular marrow (>95%). The marrow is infiltrated by mononuclear cells with medium to large sized nuclei, condensed chromatin and moderate to abundant cytoplasm. The left side showed extensive tumor necrosis with rare viable neoplastic cells. There was virtually no normal trilineage hematopoiesis seen. April 2011: Sheets of blasts with large irregular to twisted nuclei, fine chromatin, prominent nucleoli, and moderate amounts of cytoplasm with occasional fine azurophilic granules. The blasts had a monocytic/promonocytic morphology.IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY AND FLOW CYTOMETRY
January 2010: Paraffin immunohistochemistry shows the tumor cells are B cells with the following immunophenotype: positive for CD45, CD20, CD79a, PAX5 and BCL2 while negative for CD3, CD5, CD34, CD10, TdT, CD30, ALK1, and BCL6.
April 2011: 80% blasts with the following immunophenotype: positive for CD13, CD33, CD4, CD14, CD11b, CD38, CD34, CD15, MPO.CYTOGENETIC FINDINGS
January 2010: 82-84,XXXX,?+X,-1,-2,-4,?del(5)(q?),-6,-8,-10,-11,-13,?-15,+21,-22[18]
nuc ish 8q24(MYCx3),8cen(CEP8x3),14q32(IGHx4)[32/100]nuc ish 14q32(IGHx4)[30/100]nuc ish 12p13(TELx4),21q22(AML1x5)[25/100]The karyotypes showed a modal number of 82-84 chromosomes per cell considered to benear-tetraploid, and the karyotype reflects changes in relation to anexpected copy number of 4. There was no evidence for an IGH translocation, MYC-IGH fusion or TEL-AML fusion. However these studies confirmed that there were 3 copies of 8, 4copies of 12 and 14, and some cells with 5 copies of 21. Most of the changes were whole chromosome gains or losses, however loss of heterozygosity was noted for chromosome 1p and 6p. There were alternating regions of gain and loss for chromosome 5, ranging from 3 to 5 copies along the length of the chromosome. In summary, these findings are consistent with a near tetraploid leukemia.April 2011: 46,XX,t(6;11)(q27;q23)[19]nuc ish 11q23(3'MLLx2,5'MLLx2)(3'MLL sep 5'MLLx1)[181/200]The bone marrow is essentially replaced by a leukemic clone of cells with a single detectable cytogenetic abnormality. There is a balanced translocation between the long arms of chromosome 6 and 11, resulting in an interruption of the MLL locus in 11q23. The t(6;11)(q27;q23) was confirmed by FISH using a commercially available probe set for the MLL gene. The leukemia at diagnosis was near-tetraploid clone with a large number of cytogenetic changes, with no t(6;11). The results are therefore consistent with a secondary AML, and in the setting of a MLL translocation, a poor prognosis.MOLECULAR FINDINGS
SNP array
January 2010:Whole Genome SNP Array Results:Chromosome/Arm Start End Abnormality/Notes1pterp22.1 742,429 93,425,533 Dup/4 copies w/LOH1p22.1p11.2 93,461,549 121,013,322 Dup/3 copies1q Dup/3 copies2 WC Dup/3 copies3 WC Dup/4 copies4 WC Dup/3 copies5pterp15.32 91,139 5,747,586 Dup/5 copies5p15.32p14.3 5,766,635 21,908,049 Dup/4 copies5p14.3p14.1 21,908,653 27,203,395 Dup/5 copies5p14.1pcen 27,209,030 46,384,240 Dup/4 copies5q11.1q14.3 49,618,507 83,999,082 Dup/4 copies5q14.3q21.3 84,010,157 107,658,952 Dup/3 copies5q21.3q33.2 107,699,831 155,104,413 Dup/4 copies5q33.2qter 155,125,888 180,623,543 Dup/3 copies6pterp21.31 110,391 34,061,624 Dup/4 copies w/LOH6p21.31pcen 34,068,589 58,762,701 Dup/3 copies6q Dup/3 copies7 WC Dup/4 copies8 WC Dup/3 copies9 WC Dup/4 copies10 WC Dup/3 copies10q23.2q23.31 89,537,028 90,410,295 Del PTEN11 WC Dup/3 copies12 WC Dup/4 copies13 WC Dup/3 copies-4 copies14 WC Dup/4 copies16 WC Dup/? 5 copies17 WC Dup/4 copies18 WC Dup/4 copies19 WC Dup/4 copies20 WC Dup/4 copies21 WC Dup/? 4 copies-5 copies22 WC Dup/3 copiesThe results are therefore consistent with a near-tetraploid leukemia.April 2011 : Whole Genome SNP Array Results:Chromosome/Arm Start End Abnormality9p23 11,391,387 11,519,226 Htz delHigh resolution SNP array studies confirmed a small deletion in 9p that does not have any gene content, and is likely a non-contributory germline alteration.INTERESTING FEATURES
The patient presented with a diffuse large B cell lymphoma, best classified as a primary bone lymphoma. The cytogenetic studies showed a large number of cytogenetic changes and was signed out as a near tetraploid leukemia. Review of the case confirmed it was indeed a primary B cell lymphoma of bone. The patient was treated. Fifteen months later the patient presented with a secondary therapy related AML with a t(6;11). The t(6;11) was not present in the diagnostic specimen.
PROPOSED DIAGNOSIS
Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia, after treatment for primary bone lymphoma.
CONSENSUS DIAGNOSIS
Therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, acute myeloid leukemia with t(6;11)(q27;q23)